Use of Braile in Oral Health Education for the Visually Impaired Person – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Uso do Braile na Educação em Saúde Bucal Para Deficientes Visuais – Revisão Sistemática e Meta-Análise

Main Article Content

Gabriel Oliveira Figueiredo
Marcela Baraúna Magno

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of Braille, alone or combined, as a method of oral health education for patients with visual impairment. Methods: A search strategy was performed in 6 databases and gray literature, and studies published until February 2021 were retrieved. Following the acronym PICOS, randomized controlled clinical trials (S) that evaluated people with visual impairment (P) who received oral hygiene instruction with educational methods containing braille alone or combined (I) compared to educational methods without Braille (C) and evaluated its influence on oral hygiene indices (O) were considered eligible. The risk of bias of studies considered eligiblew was assessed using the ROB.2 tool and meta-analyses were performed to compare the different methods in relation to plaque and gingival index. The certainty of the evidence was assessed (GRADE). Results: Nine articles were included in this review and five in the meta-analysis. All studies were classified as ‘some concern’ regarding the risk of bias. Braille, when used isolated, is inferior to other methods (p<0,05); when used in association with audio or audio-tactileperformance (ATP) it is similar to ATP (p>0,05), and when implemented together with ATP, it is superior to techniques without Braille (p<0,05). The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusion: Multisensory methods including Braille and ATP are more efficient, while Braille used alone is less efficient, when both are compared to oral health education methods without Braille.

Article Details

How to Cite
Oliveira Figueiredo, G., & Baraúna Magno, M. (2022). Use of Braile in Oral Health Education for the Visually Impaired Person – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Naval Dental Jounal, 49(1), 04-18. https://doi.org/10.29327/25149.49.1-1
Section
Original Article
Author Biographies

Gabriel Oliveira Figueiredo, Salgado de Oliveira University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro

Student of Dentistry at the Salgado de Oliveira University.

Marcela Baraúna Magno, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Post-Doctoral Student in Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Adjunct.
Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Veiga de Almeida.  

References

1. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde: CID-10 Tenth review. Translation: Centro Colaborador da Organização Mundial da Saúde para a Classificação de Doenças em Português. 3a ed. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1996. 2. Das D, Suresan V, Jnaneswar A, Pathi J, Bala Subramaniam G. Effectiveness of a novel oral health education technique in maintenance of gingival health and plaque removal efficacy among institutionalized visually impaired children of Bhubaneswar city: A randomized controlled trial. Spec Care Dentist. 2019 Mar;39(2):125134. doi: 10.1111/scd.12350. Epub 2018 Dec 30. PMID: 30597580. 3. Shetty V, Hegde AM, Bhandary S, Rai K. Oral health status of the visually impaired children--a south Indian study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Spring;34(3):213-6. doi: 10.17796/ jcpd.34.3.j4781g2w8891848u. PMID: 20578657. 4. Mahantesha T, Nara A, Kumari PR, Halemani PK, Buddiga V, Mythri S. A comparative evaluation of oral hygiene using Braille and audio instructions among institutionalized visually impaired children aged between 6 years and 20 years: A 3-monthfollow-up study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Dec;5(Suppl 2):S129-32. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.172953. PMID: 26942117; PMCID: PMC4756567. 5. Ryan, R., & Hill, S. (2016). How to GRADE the quality of the evidence. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group available at http://cccrg.cochrane.org/authorresourcesVersion 3.0. 6. Maidenbaum et al., 2014. The “EyeCane”, a new electronic travel aid for the blind: Technology, behavior & swift learning. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, v.32, n.6, p.813-824, 2014). 7. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898. 8. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332. PMID: 20332509; PMCID: PMC2844940. 9. Papagno C, Minniti G, Mattavelli GC, Mantovan L, Cecchetto C. Tactile short-term memory in sensory-deprived individuals. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Feb;235(2):471-480. doi:
Revista Naval de Odontologia - 2022 - Volume 49 Número 110
10.1007/s00221-016-4808-0. Epub 2016 Oct 26. PMID: 27785548. 10. Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e888–97. 11. Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, et al. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: Magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2377–84. 12. Ganapathi AK, Namineni S, Vaaka PH, K V, Das R, Devi M, Akkaloori A, Kumbakonam A. Effectiveness of Various Sensory Input Methods in Dental Health Education Among Blind Children- A Comparative Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC75-8. doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2015/15499.6686. Epub 2015 Oct 1. PMID: 26557623; PMCID: PMC4625342. 13. Deshpande S, Rajpurohit L, Kokka VV. Effectiveness of braille and audio-tactile performance technique for improving oral hygiene status of visually impaired adolescents. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):27-31. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_149_17. PMID: 29386797; PMCID: PMC5767985. 14. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. 15. Tiwari BS, Ankola AV, Jalihal S, Patil P, Sankeshwari RM, Kashyap BR. Effectiveness of different oral health edu
cation interventions in visually impaired school children. Spec Care Dentist. 2019 Mar;39(2):97-107. doi: 10.1111/ scd.12356. Epub 2019 Jan 18. PMID: 30657191. 16. Gautam A, Bhambal A, Moghe S. Effect of oral health education by audio aids, Braille & tactile models on the oral health status of visually impaired children of Bhopal city. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(3):168-170. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.03.002. 17. Chowdary PB, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao VV, Rayala C. Impact of verbal, Braille text, and tactile oral hygiene awareness instructions on oral health status of visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;34(1):43-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.175510. PMID: 26838147. 18. Alamsyah M, Natassa S. Difference in Effectiveness of Dental Health Education between Braille and Audio Method towards the Knowledge and Oral Health (OHIS) Score among the Blind Children. Atlantis Press. Advances in Health Science Research, IDCSU 2017. 19. Sardana D, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A, Manchanda S. Effect of specially designed oral health preventive programme on oral health of visually impaired children: use of audio and tactile aids. Int Dent J. 2019 Apr;69(2):98106. doi: 10.1111/idj.12436. Epub 2018 Sep 21. PMID: 30238976. 20. Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e888–97. 21. Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, et al. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: Magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2377–84.